Website Audit Rating Scheme

GENERAL RATING SCHEME
1 Very poor
2 Poor
3 Below Average
4 Average
5 Above Average
6 Good
7 Excellent

WEBSITE GRADER - SEO RATING
1 to 10 POOR
11 to 20 AVERAGE (Acceptable)
21 to 30 ABOVE AVERAGE (Above Average)

FORMULAR FOR RATING THE USER EXPERIENCE USING GOOGLE PAGE SPEED INSIGHTS
ROUND((((X+Y)/100)*7)/2,0)
where: X= Mobile Score
Y= Desktop Score

User Interface Rating Keys

1. Very Poor
• Incoherent Design
• Key Information Buried
• Difficult Navigation Structures
• Unconventional Colors
• Very Low Quality Graphics
• Bad Typography
• Difficult Navigation Structures
• Low Quality Graphics
• Poor Information Architecture
• No Call To Actions
• Lack of Mobile Compatibility
• No Call To Actions
• Lacks Information Architecture
• Lack of Mobile Compatibility

2. Poor
• Incoherent Design
• Key Information Buried
• Difficult Navigation Structures
• Low Quality Graphics
• Poor Information Architecture
• No Call To Actions
• Lack of Mobile Compatibility

3. Below Average
• Incoherent Design
• Key Information Buried
• Difficult Navigation Structures
• Low Quality Graphics
• Poor Information Architecture
• No Call To Actions
• Lack of Mobile Compatibility

4. Average
• Incoherent Design
• Difficult Navigation Structures
• Low Quality Graphics
• Poor Information Architecture
• No Call To Actions

5. Above Average
• Key Information is Visible
• Easy Navigation Structures
• Medium Quality Graphics
• Good Information Architecture

6. Good
• Coherent Design
• Key Information is Visible
• Easy Navigation Structures
• Medium Quality Graphics
• Good Information Architecture
• Call To Actions

7. Very Good
• Coherent Design
• Key Information is Visible
• Easy Navigation Structures
• High Quality Graphics
• Excellent Information Architecture
• Call To Actions
• Mobile Compatibility

User Experience Rating Keys

1. Very Poor
• Very Slow loading sites
• Frustrating Popups, Ads
• Stock Photos
• Unnecessary Complexity
• Lack Of Engagement
• Very Boring
• Lack of Contact information

2. Poor
• Slow loading sites
• Frustrating Popups, Ads
• Stock Photos
• Unnecessary Complexity
• Lack Of Engagement
• Boring
• Lack of Contact information

3. Below Average
• Slow loading sites
• Frustrating Popups, Ads
• Stock Photos
• Unnecessary Complexity
• Lack Of Engagement
• Boring

4. Average
• Slow loading sites
• Stock Photos
• Unnecessary Complexity
• Lack Of Engagement
• Boring

5. Above Average
• Average site loading speed
• No Intrusive Popups, Ads
• No Stock Photos
• Engaging Website

6. Good
• Medium site loading speed
• No Intrusive Popups, Ads
• No Stock Photos
• Engaging Website
• Easy to locate Contact information

7. Very Good
• Fast loading sites
• No Intrusive Popups, Ads
• No Stock Photos
• Engaging Website
• Easy to locate Contact information

User Satisfaction Survey 2022
 
1 Start 2 Complete
0%
CONTACT DETAILS
KINDLY SELECT YOUR LEVEL OF SATISFACTION
SUGGESTIONS AND ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.